What is an internal communications plan for?
An internal communication plan organizes the way an organization shares information, listens to its teams and connects communication with its objectives.
It can serve to improve coordination between areas, reduce duplication, facilitate access to important information, accompany change processes, strengthen organizational culture or improve the relationship between management and teams. It also allows you to establish who should communicate what, to whom, when and by what means.
This is particularly important in organizations with geographically distributed equipment, hybrid or remote work, temporary projects or structures where people with very different functions and information needs participate. The goal should not be to communicate more. It should be better to communicate.
Although each organization needs a different solution, a basic plan should include: diagnosis of current communication; communication objectives; identification and segmentation of internal audiences; priority messages; communication channels and spaces; responsible; calendar or frequency; feedback mechanisms; and indicators to measure results.
A matrix can organize these elements in a simple way:
Objective
Public
Message
Channel
Responsible
Frequency
Indicator
The matrix is useful, but it is not the plan itself. The real job is in the decisions that allow it to be filled correctly.
How to make an internal communication plan step by step
Diagnose before communicating
The first step is to understand how information currently circulates. It does not always require complex research. Depending on the size of the organization, interviews, short surveys, conversations with teams, review of emails and platforms, document analysis and observation of existing channels can be used. The important thing is to find out what is working and where the problems appear.
It is convenient to ask:
What information do people need to do their job?
What information do they currently receive?
What arrives late or doubles?
What channels do they really use?
Do you know where to find the important information?
Who communicates institutional decisions?
Are there spaces to ask, answer or express disagreements?
This stage may reveal that many organizations do not have a problem of lack of communication, but of excess, fragmentation, opportunity or relevance of information.
Define what we want to achieve
"Improving internal communication" is too broad to function as a goal. A useful objective should describe a more concrete result: reduce the duplication of information between departments, improve communication between management and territorial teams, get collaborators to understand institutional priorities or strengthen feedback mechanisms.
The key question is: what should work differently after implementing the plan?
Identify internal audiences
One of the most frequent mistakes is to talk about the "internal public" as if all the people within an organization were equal. There may be management, middle commands, technical teams, administrative staff, territorial teams, consultants, temporary staff, new hires and people working remotely.
For each group, it is convenient to ask themselves what they need to know, what decisions they should make, what we expect them to do with the information, what channel they use and who is a credible source. Segmenting allows you to avoid one of the great evils of internal communication: sending everything to everyone.
Define priority messages and content
An organization produces a lot of information, but not all have the same importance. The plan should establish which messages are priority for each group and what action we expect after communicating them.
Sending an email is an action. That a person receives the information, understands it and knows what to do with it is a result of communication. Before writing, it is convenient to answer: what does this person need to know? Why does he need to know? And what do we expect him to do next?
Choose the right channels
Correo electrónico, reuniones, WhatsApp, Teams, Slack, intranet, boletines, videollamadas y plataformas colaborativas pueden formar parte del sistema, pero ninguno funciona para todo. La pregunta correcta no es “¿qué canal tenemos disponible?”, sino “¿qué necesita ocurrir después de que esta persona reciba la información?”. La respuesta ayuda a seleccionar el canal.
Establish responsible
Someone must produce the information, validate it, communicate it, answer questions and update it when it changes. When these responsibilities are not clear, communication ends up depending on individual initiatives. Middle managers and team managers are especially important: they need to understand the messages, contextualize them and have the ability to answer questions.
Create a realistic calendar
The calendar organizes actions, responsible and frequency. But filling every day of the month with activities does not mean having a good strategy. Part of the work may consist of reducing unnecessary communication: deleting a newsletter that no one reads, consolidating groups, decreasing meetings or ordering what type of information corresponds to each channel. A good plan also decides what to stop doing.
Measure and adjust
An internal communication plan should not remain intact for years. You have to observe what works, what doesn't and what needs to be modified. Communication changes because people, teams, tools and priorities change. Measuring allows us to return to the diagnosis and continuously improve the system.
How to measure if internal communication is working?
Counting emails sent, meetings made or publications made allows you to measure activity, but says little about the result. Even a high opening rate only shows that someone opened a message. Not necessarily that he understood it.
It is advisable to assess whether people know the priorities, know where to find important information, receive the information on time, better understand the decisions, use the channels correctly and feel that they can ask questions and receive answers. Short surveys, interviews, conversation groups, digital analytics and observation can provide a more useful picture.
Frequent errors in an internal communication plan
Start with the tools. Buying a platform or creating another group does not automatically solve a communication problem.
Confusing information with communication. Publishing something does not mean that people have found, understood or used it.
Create too many channels. When the same information appears in multiple ways, it can increase confusion.
Send everything to everyone. Relevance is as important as the amount of information.
Communicate only from top to bottom. An organization needs mechanisms to inform, but also to listen.
Do not involve team leaders. They are central actors in internal communication.
Measure activity only. One hundred messages sent can constitute a statistical success and a communication failure.
Do not update the plan. Information needs and channels change with the organization.
Can an organization make its own internal communication plan?
Yes. A small organization can use these stages to make a first diagnosis and order its communication actions. Even answering these questions can reveal problems that had been normalized.
The difficulty appears when interpreting what we find. A channel with little use can mean that the tool is inadequate, but it can also indicate information saturation, lack of trust, leadership problems or irrelevant content. There is the difference between completing a template and designing a strategy.
The job of a communication specialist consists of diagnosing what is really hindering communication, distinguishing symptoms from causes and designing a system appropriate to the culture, structure and needs of each organization.
Frequently asked questions about internal communication plans
What should an internal communication plan include?
An internal communication plan should include a diagnosis of the current situation, objectives, internal audiences, priority messages, channels, managers, calendar, feedback mechanisms and indicators. These elements must respond to real problems and needs of the organization, not simply organize communication activities.
¿How do you make an internal communication plan step by step?
The process begins by diagnosing how the information currently circulates. Then the objectives are defined, the internal audiences are identified and segmented, messages and channels are established, responsibilities are assigned, actions are programmed and indicators are determined to evaluate results. The plan must be reviewed and adjusted periodically.
How do you know if internal communication is working?
It is not enough to count emails sent, meetings made or opening rates. It is also necessary to evaluate whether people receive information on time, understand decisions, know where to find what they need, can relate institutional priorities to their work and have mechanisms to ask and give feedback.
What is the difference between a strategy and an internal communication plan?
The strategy establishes what we want to achieve through communication, with whom, why and under what approach. The plan converts those strategic decisions into concrete actions, messages, channels, managers, times and indicators. A calendar of activities without these prior decisions is not in itself a strategy.
When does an organization need to hire an internal communication specialist?
It is advisable to seek specialized support when there are recurring coordination problems, excess or lack of information, too many channels, difficulties between management and teams, organizational change processes or little clarity about the causes of the problem. The specialist can diagnose the situation and convert the findings into a strategy adapted to the organization.
De la información a una comunicación que funciona
A good internal communication plan is not the one that produces more messages, meetings or publications. It is the one that gets people to find the information they need, understand the decisions, know what is expected of them and have mechanisms to respond. That's why internal communication begins long before writing a message. Start by understanding how the organization works.
Comments